One of the themes of last year’s Occupy protest was income inequality, focusing especially on how much wealth the top 1% of income earners controlled. Income inequality has always been of interest in discussing what makes a fair society but economists also refer to income inequality when discussing what makes an efficient society. An economy without income inequality is also an economy without incentives.
One of the measures of inequality is called the Gini coefficient. It goes from 1 in a society where one person controls all the wealth to 0 in a society where everybody earns exactly the same income. You can see some of the pitfalls in both such extremes – from the envy and tension of a god-king ruling every aspect of life to the drab uniformity of life where everyone gets the same reward no matter how much they contribute or how hard they try. My subject for today is what are the factors that lead to the income inequality demonstrated for a given society?
The most obvious factor is political philosophy. There is an instructive graph on the Wikipedia site for the Gini coefficient. It shows a 54% increase in inequality in the United Kingdom from 1979-2000 during the reign of Margaret Thatcher, John Major and the first few years of Tony Blair. This is interesting because the index had been stable and low (greater equality) for the previous 30 years. Something similar happened in the US during the conservative administrations of Reagan and Bush Sr. (1981-1993), with inequality increasing by a more modest 17%. It was relatively stable before and after. The graph also shows a big shift towards inequality in Bulgaria and Poland as they transitioned out of communism in 1989. That said, it is difficult to predict how fair the income distribution of a country is by their brand of politics. Poor countries tend to have high inequality even when their politics is more socialist.
In fact, affluence is one of the better predictors of inequality:
This needs a little explaining. Inequality (the Gini coefficient) decreases from left to right as the average income of the country increases along the bottom axis. Richer countries are more generous! In any case their income is more evenly distributed. To get a closer look at these countries, let’s look at the same graph with some names attached:
South American countries stand out as being poor and unfair while Scandinavia comes out as rich and fair. The USA has higher inequality than would be predicted on the basis of average income. France, United Kingdom and their associated countries (Belgium, Canada, Australia and New Zealand) all cluster around the same level of wealth and inequality.
One final factor, education, explains some of the departures from the prediction line in these graphs. The percentage of population going on to post secondary studies (including vocational schools and community colleges) is negatively related to inequality. That is, generally speaking, countries with more training have a more equal income distribution. Though only a little more than a quarter of the variation in the Gini coefficient is explained by affluence and education, this is much better than can be done with a measure of political philosophy (for example, The Economist magazine’s economic freedom index).
Though politicians appear to be able to adjust inequality in their societies within a decade or less, the history and fundamental values of the society seem to be more important in determining how fair the distribution of wealth will be. Next time we will look at the consequences of income inequality.
I am glad to be one of many visitants on this outstanding website (:, thanks for posting.
Permalinkfantastic submit, very informative. I ponder why the opposite experts of this sector do not realize this. You must proceed your writing. I am confident, you’ve a huge readers’ base already!
PermalinkIt’s onerous to search out knowledgeable people on this topic, however you sound like you realize what you’re speaking about! Thanks
PermalinkI don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good. I don’t know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous blogger if you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!
Permalinkwonderful post.Ne’er knew this, appreciate it for letting me know.
PermalinkGreat V I should definitely pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related information ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, site theme . a tones way for your customer to communicate. Nice task..
PermalinkI believe this web site has very fantastic indited written content articles.
PermalinkPost writing is also a excitement, if you be familiar with afterward you can write or else it is complicated to write.
PermalinkI’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but your sites really nice, keep it
Permalinkup! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back down the road.
Many thanks
I appreciate, lead to I found exactly what
PermalinkI used to be taking a look for. You have ended my 4 day long hunt!
God Bless you man. Have a nice day. Bye
You are so awesome! I don’t think I’ve truly read something
Permalinklike that before. So wonderful to find somebody with unique thoughts on this topic.
Really.. many thanks for starting this up. This web site is one thing that is
needed on the internet, someone with some originality!